Every link prospecting spreadsheet you have ever opened probably sorts by one column first: Domain Authority. On a recent episode of Unscripted SEO, Semantic Links founder Bradley Benner argued that habit is exactly backwards — and that the fix is a vetting order most teams never bother to write down.
The metric-first habit is quietly wasting your budget
Benner has been buying and placing links at scale since launching his white-label off-page service in 2022, and after months of testing he landed on a conclusion that reorders the entire qualification process. A high DA number on an irrelevant page does nothing for the entity you are trying to build. A modest domain that is genuinely on-topic does a lot.
It’s not some stupid third-party metric like DA or DR or trust flow or anything else that matters about whether a link is valuable or not. What matters is whether it’s relevant.— Bradley Benner, Unscripted SEO
This is not an argument to throw metrics away. It is an argument about order. Relevance is the qualifier; DA, DR, and Trust Flow are a secondary tiebreaker you only reach for after a prospect has already passed the relevance test. If you are running structured campaigns, the same principle underpins good outreach and content link building — fit before firepower.
Why relevance beats authority in an LLM-shaped search world
Benner’s reasoning is mechanical, not philosophical. A language model now sits behind nearly every search surface, and those models do not treat a link as a unit of PageRank to be counted. They treat it as navigation — a path they crawl to test whether a relevant association exists between two things. If a link points from a page that has no topical relationship to its target, the model has no reason to care that it was placed. The link has, in his framing, no purpose. A big authority score cannot rescue a connection the model reads as noise.
That reframe is why he is blunt about agencies still selling DA-chasing packages: the metric was only ever a proxy for relevance and trust, and it stopped being a reliable one years ago. The good news is that putting relevance first makes vetting cheaper — you can disqualify most of a bad list on relevance alone before you ever pay for a metrics tool.
The three layers of link relevance
The heart of Benner’s method is that relevance is not a single yes/no check on the page where your link will sit. It compounds across three layers, and a strong prospect earns a yes on all three.
Score every prospect on all three layers
A link is only as relevant as its weakest layer. Run each prospect through all three before you look at a single metric.
Layer 1 — The content
Is the specific piece of content your link lives in actually about the topic your target page covers? A tree-service link inside a tree-care how-to passes; the same link dropped into a generic ‘business tips’ roundup does not.
Layer 2 — The host site
Zoom out from the page to the whole domain. Are the site’s overall topical themes relevant to your target? One on-topic post on an otherwise unrelated site is a weaker signal than a post on a site that lives and breathes the subject.
Layer 3 — The referring domain’s own backlinks
Look at the backlink profile already pointing at the host domain. Is that profile topically relevant too? Relevance flows through the neighborhood, so a domain trusted by the right sites passes value your target can actually use.
The relevance-first vetting checklist
Run every prospect through this order
Define the target entity first
Before you touch a prospect list, write down the brand, the specific service, and the location you are trying to strengthen. Everything downstream is judged against that trio, not against a keyword.
Check Layer 1 — content relevance
Read the actual placement context. If the surrounding content is not genuinely about your target topic, disqualify it now and save yourself the metrics lookup.
Check Layer 2 — site theme relevance
Scan the site’s categories, recent posts, and navigation. Confirm the domain’s overall themes align with your target before you go further.
Check Layer 3 — referring-domain profile
Pull the host domain’s backlinks and eyeball whether its own inbound links come from a relevant neighborhood. A relevant profile compounds the value; an off-topic one dilutes it.
Only now, apply metrics as a tiebreaker
Two prospects both cleared all three relevance layers? Fine — now DA, DR, or Trust Flow can break the tie and help you prioritize. Never let the metric jump the line.
Confirm a natural anchor fits
A relevant placement should let you use a brand or compound anchor without contorting the sentence. If the only anchor that fits is an exact-match keyword, the placement is probably less relevant than it looked.
The payoff of doing this in order is speed and spend: you kill most weak prospects on Layer 1 for free, and you reserve your paid tools and your outreach hours for links that will actually move an entity. If you would rather hand the vetting and placement to a team that already works this way, our link building outreach service is built around relevance-first qualification rather than DA quotas.
Benner’s bottom line is almost freeing: stop grading links on a number that stopped meaning what you think it means, and start grading them on whether they make sense. The links that survive that test are the ones a language model — and a human reader — can actually justify.
Want these links built for you?
Book a free 30-minute link building call with Jeremy and we’ll put the right ethical tactics to work on your site.
Book a Link Building Call →